percDM: northwestern just breezed into the red zone and kicked another field goal.
timstwrt: this is a real test for my "indifference towards the head coach" campaign
percDM: i don't like where you are going with this, because i've already copied "i've resolved this season to not comment on the head coach" from the blog, so i'd be ready to drop it on you
timstwrt: although, if your team allows 100 offensive plays and 560 yeards by the other team, yet you still manage to have the ball only down 2 with five minutes left....perhaps that's perversely an amazing feat of coaching?
best coach ever!
percDM: haha
timstwrt: the rope-a-dope almost worked
percDM: the defensive approach was...interesting
it was an extreme bend but don't break
and we got dominated in yardage, but we only gave up 22 points
timstwrt: my ability to break down the defensive schemes is hampered by: a) our vantage point from the southwest corner of the end zone and b) the fact that i didn't rewatch the game on television because i'm not a masochist
i actually thought we adjusted
and then tackled poorly
we were getting underneath on the bubble screens and then just not hitting guys
percDM: i didn't feel like i saw much in the way of adjustments, although you are right about the bubble screens late in the game
mainly, i remember huge cushions, all day long
and northwestern dinked and dunked all day long
timstwrt: i guess the essential question of how this game should be viewed is:
are our players not very good, and the coaches are trying to compensate, or is the coaching so conservative that it is hindering the ability of the players?
percDM: i actually think it is the latter, but it is even more than the conservative scheming/game management
it seems like the coaches can't coach the fundamentals
timstwrt: no matter the answer, it's on spaziani, which is why the new wave of #firespaz isn't interesting to me. he's not good at running a football program. we know this. he'll be gone as soon as the new AD unpacks his boxes.
percDM: that's all intellectually true
timstwrt: i mean, you can say that about the fundamentals, but how much coaching goes into "hold onto the ball, deuce?"
the late hits are another thing, i guess
percDM: yeah, a fumble here and a fumble there aren't on the coach
but, bc has fumbled a ton this year
the tackling is poor
there were mental breakdowns like the late hits
and then there was the 25 rushing yards on 21 attempts
how does a school that was known as o-line u become a program that can't pick up even an average of 2 yards per run
timstwrt: it's embarrassing
it was just such a strange game
on the one hand, we should've lost by 30
on the other, we had the ball down 2 with a few minutes left
and, of course, nothing i've read about the game has discussed the touchback that wasn't on that late punt that left us at the 1
which seems like a pretty pivotal play
percDM: that touchback that wasn't was a huge play
one of the key plays of the game, for sure
and i don't know why it wasn't reviewed
we were in that end zone, and had a pretty good vantage point, and it definitely looked like a touchback
timstwrt: goddamn replacement refs (every level of football has replacement refs, right?)
percDM: but of course, the finch fumble was the biggest play
especially since it was followed by a huge drive by northwestern
timstwrt: i think it was a big play, and deuce, if you're one of our 40 readers, you need to hold on to the ball. but northwestern was never really in danger. if we had gone ahead that early, i'm certain that NU would've found the end zone
the way we were playing, the only way we sneak out of there with a win is to score on that last drive, where we got screwed on the non-touchback
percDM: yeah, we needed that drive
and of course, after that 3 and out, northwestern finally got in the end zone
i believe that by then, our defense was exhausted
the bend but don't break strategy will do that to you when you don't really hold on to the ball
timstwrt: this looks like 4-8 to me
army, maryland, nc state
not sure who else we can beat....that wake forest game will be a real battle of titans
percDM: yeah, i think army and maryland gets us to 3 wins
and we win 2 of these three games: wake, nc st, and notre dame
notre dame, just because
so, 5-7
i think that since chase can make plays, we can be dangerous on offense
and if swigert comes back soon, we have a solid receiving corps
with amidon and coleman
although, throwing to anyone else seems almost criminal since they have about a 1 in 3 chance of catching the ball
and the spaz conservative defensive gameplan can frustrate some teams and coaches (i think brian kelly especially)
but, 5-7 still means a total house cleaning, which the program needs. and i hate to use this term, because it is usually just cliched bullshit, but the program needs to regain some kind of identity
timstwrt: house cleaning and identity creation...sounds like you're doing some management consulting
percDM: that's just because this kind of disarray is what consultants thrive on
timstwrt: i don't know if they need an identity so much as some line coaches
percDM: you think line coaches is the issue?
just get a little better at the line of scrimmage and this is an 8-4 team?
timstwrt: actually, i know you're being glib, but yes. not a very good 8-4 team, but an 8-4 team nonetheless. if the offensive and defensive lines were 20% better on saturday, we win that game
i think the difference between winning ugly and losing ugly is there. and probably will be there in enough games to get a bunch of wins.
there are three games on our schedule that probably aren't winnable.
percDM: vatech, fsu, and clemson
timstwrt: but other than those, we're not going up against leviathans
the lines have been the biggest problem area during the malaise of the last year and a half
and if they were a little better, spaz could play spaz ball and be adequate
so it's probably better that they're not, because it means that he won't be able to hang on very long
scratch what i said....keep doing what you do, offensive and defensive linemen!
percDM: so, what do we have to look forward to for the rest of the year? the continued improvement of rettig?
anything else?
timstwrt: i just sat here for thirty seconds genuinely pondering your queston.
and drew a blank
i'm looking forward to going to the army game....west point is supposed to be quite an experience
but we'll probably lose 2-0
percDM: haha
it's never been this bleak
or i guess, this bland
timstwrt: just wait, it'll get blander
there's your 2012 motto
not bland enough for you? we'll hit you with 35 rushes for 32 yards, and 12 punts. boston college football: we'll bland the fuck out of you.
percDM: this is from last year, early october:
percDM
i can't wait
this season is soul crushing
and its not just the play on the field
its gene and spaz and everything around this football program right now
timstwrt
and that, my friends, is where this post ends, not with a bang but a crushed soul
our purgatory is turning into a hell
timstwrt: like groundhog day, without a hilarious beaver-driving scene.
re: the touchback that wasn't: I think the terrible announcers on the illegal Big10 feed I was watching on some Russian website (because even if I paid for the BTN, Comcast chose to show the Boston market the historic UMass Michigan game) answered my apathetic shock at the no-call by saying that in college it doesn't matter if the defenseman is in the endzone as long as the ball doesn't break the plane. Is that not true?
ReplyDelete