Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Notre Dame to the ACCish: Wild, Baseless Speculation is Our Lifeblood
percDM: ND to ACC in all sports but football
will play 5 games against ACC teams in football
timstwrt: indeed
percDM: big move for acc, more bad news for big east
timstwrt: it seems i'm about three minutes ahead of everyone on this
since i just had four chat boxes pop up saying the same thing
holy shit, ACC is also jacking exit fees to $50m
percDM: makes sense
timstwrt: also, bad for purdue
percDM: no its not
i don't think
timstwrt: five ACC games, and ND leak says the only protected rivals are stanford, USC, navy
percDM: nd will play 5 acc teams, 3 big ten teams, 2 pac-12 teams, navy, an d one other game
percDM: this is also great for uconn
in that uconn will never be in the acc
timstwrt: i don't think it'll be three big ten teams, but i've re-evaluated and think they'll keep michigan and purdue
percDM: i do think michigan and purdue are bigger rivals for nd than michigan st
but, i'm not sure why they wouldn't keep three bigten teams, they've played those three teams forever
timstwrt: i don't think they want to have 11 committed games every year. if they did, they would just join a football conference
percDM: they have 9 right now
10 if you include bc in that
timstwrt: have you switched over to making my argument for me?
9 and 10 are fewer than 11, right?
percDM: but those are conference levels of commtment
i'm not sure what nd loses by have 11 committed games
they could still schedule one big 12 or sec school
or more likely, tulsa
or some crappy school
timstwrt: they lose the option of scheduling one crappy school and one marquee school
percDM: i honestly think they'll get their yearly crap from the acc
5 games is a lot
timstwrt: i guess they might rotate through the whole ACC
which wouldn't be great for us
percDM: they might, but i don't think they will
they've traditionally played bc and pitt
maybe they'll lock in those
and rotate the other 3 games
they've got some history with miami and syracuse
somewhat of a history with georgia tech too
percDM: will it also cost nd $50 million to leave the conference?
timstwrt: yes
percDM: also, i just looked at nd's schedule this year
they're playing bc, miami, pitt, and wake forest
that's already four acc teams
that 50 million is a big number
because that means if nd's football independence becomes threatened by the huge conference money, they'll join the acc
and not the big ten
timstwrt: so, does it make sense to grab georgetown and have a 16 team basketball league?
percDM: yeah, i think its georgetown
i guess it could be villanova, although they are trying to build a football program, so they're probably out of the running
percDM: from the blog on sept 20 of last year: i see the best scenario as nd and georgetown joining as non-football playing schools
we are very close
timstwrt: i'm sure you would have dug that up if it had been something i said
percDM: haha
of course
you were pushing for georgetown and villanova
which was a fine scenario
timstwrt: i was pushing for anything that blocked uconn
this works
percDM: and maybe better
i just saw eagle in atlanta said this meant the acc would probably add uconn or rutgers
and i completely disagree
i think georgetown remains the most likely option
timstwrt: rutgers or uconn makes no sense
percDM: but providence would be a giant fuck you to the big east
p.s. i don't want it to be providence
timstwrt: let's walk through this
say you add uconn
you have unbalanced football divisons?
or notre dame plays all five of their games within one division?
percDM: can you make that work with the 5 nd games?
timstwrt: still doesn't work
because there'd be someone not playing an ostensible "divisional" opponent
percDM: right
timstwrt: and all of this doesn't acknowledge the fact that there's a much easier option out there, and they're playing basketball in our nation's capital
percDM: who else is an option besides georgetown
st. john's?
timstwrt: with notre dame's quasi-affiliation and $50m exit fees, football is protected
may as well reassert basketball's dominance and call it a day
i guess st. john's or providence
in that order
percDM: is there any reason georgetown wouldn't want to leave the big east?
timstwrt: history
percDM: yeah, but with syracuse in the acc, isn't that a lot of the history?
and add nd, pitt, and bc
timstwrt: you asked if there was a reason. i didn't say it was a good one.
percDM: yeah, that was unfair
i wanted you to be my straw man
timstwrt: there's not a compelling reason that i see, no
although, travel considerations might be a bigger factor when you don't have the football cash cow
percDM: but the new big east is going to have huge travel issues
even in non-football
timstwrt: yeah, i'm going more "straw grabber" than "straw man"
i don't know why they wouldn't
percDM: i think this is great for the acc
and good for bc
although i am a little worried about losing the yearly series with nd
which, i guess, could happen
timstwrt: and awful for the university of connecticut!
percDM: that's the cherry on top
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I was wrong about the ACC adding Georgetown. I was hopeful about BC continuing to play ND annually, and I was wrong about that. If the pattern holds, I'm also wrong about ND keeping all three of their traditional Big Ten games.
ReplyDeleteI'm fine with the ACC not adding Georgetown. They must have an idea on how to make the fifteen team basketball schedule work.
I hope the ACC isn't holding off on adding a non-football member because they are hoping ND will sometime join as a full member.
I'm disappointed that the ND-BC series won't continue on an annual basis. It has been a great out of conference series for BC. Losing that will hurt the Eagles, but the stability that the ACC gains is a net benefit to BC.
On a personal note, as someone who grew up a Purdue fan before attending BC, both the BC-ND and Purdue-ND games were big deals in my family. The possibility that both annual series against ND could come to an end is very disappointing.